Raúl Ruiz's Mysteries of Lisbon (
Mistérios de Lisboa), from a
Carlos Saboga adaptation of
Camilo Castelo Branco's nineteenth-century novel of the same name, recasts the Chinese box narrative structure most famously associated with the director's earlier period masterpiece,
The Three Crowns of the Sailor (1983), where stories continuously unfold within stories and more within these and so on, through a series of graceful, circling sequence-shots that call to mind the temporally-unstable spaces of the filmmaker's
Marcel Proust-adaptation
Time Regained (1999). Here, however, Ruiz does not alter temporality within a single spatial field - though he does at one point present two of the lead's selves within a single frame, thereby replicating
Time Regained's stunning denouement - but instead reserves his ever shifting chronology for the editing room, with his cutting again rarely employed analytically within a single fragment of time and space (save for a handful of passages of shot/reverse-shot, often presenting two male speakers). In
Mysteries of Lisbon, Ruiz's fluid camera work principally serves his fluid progression of stories, their next-to infinite regression, with re-framings in all but a handful of examples accomplished within rather than without the camera and figure movement universally recapitulated in the visual field through its tight figural identification - moored to his stories' many tellers. The director's long-shot, long-take work also affords for the re-introduction of
The Three Crowns of the Sailor's aggressively planar, baroque compositions, at times inorganic and at others not, with servers, in their organic usage, adopting foreground positions where they will overhear the gossip, in the frame's recesses, that will lead to the masters' ceaseless miseries. (Ruiz, it is worth noting, also recalls the trick cinematography of the earlier masterpiece in his use, for example, of an extreme low-angle that takes the place of a floor, onto which shards of a ripped paper are dropped.)
Yet, for
Mysteries of Lisbon, as for
The Three Crowns of the Sailors, it remains all about the telling. Borrowed from the novel, Ruiz and screenwriter Saboga replicate the multiple-twist narrational structure of the late nineteenth century serial for their conventionally melodramatic, ultra-Romantic tale of masked identity, unknown paternity and ubiquitous suffering and heartbreak. Standing at the center of Ruiz's latest is Joao/Pedro da Silva (played in his teenage years by
João Baptista, and
José Afonso Pimentel for his young adulthood), an epileptic orphan, under the care of shape-shifting priest Father Dinis (
Adriano Luz), who comes to discover the identity of both parents, before involving himself in the same socially-determined tragedy as those who have preceded him - including his father, mother and even Dinis himself. Each of the latter's stories, and those of many, many more, are narrated on-screen and then in flashback, within Joao/Pedro da Silva's overarching, voiced-off recounting. Ruiz additionally offers static illustrations of numerous scenes with the younger Joao's puppet theatre, which not only implicitly allegorizes the fate of the young man and his ancestors, but also suggests a manipulator of the broader narrative - which is to say Ruiz himself.
Mysteries of Lisbon very much proves the ultimate vehicle for its ever narrative-obsessed director, with its structure that allows for storytelling to become an endless, virtually existential act - highly appropriate for the Chile-born author of more than one-hundred films;
Mysteries of Lisbon is the director's career in 272-minute microcosm - its subject that springs forth finally from memory (in the image of
Time Regained) and its figures whose identities and even self-hoods prove as fluid as the film's time and space. The director's latest emerges as a new signature accomplishment, a masterpiece no doubt for the director, and also a worthy companion to
Manoel de Oliveira's supreme masterwork culled from the same authorial source,
Doomed Love (1978). There could be no greater compliment to Ruiz's latest than this.
***
For this writer, the
2010 New York Film Festival provided the strongest set of high-end cinematic achievements in quite some time, with
Mysteries of Lisbon,
Uncle Boonmee Who Can Recall His Past Lives,
Certified Copy and
Tuesday After Christmas leading the way, followed, on a somewhat lower level, by
The Social Network. In addition to these, this author was also present for a trio of significant, if not major works, recapped below in order of viewing, along with
Lee Chang-dong's solid and solidly mid-range
Poetry (pictured)
, with the director characteristically guiding
Yoon Jeong-hee to a laudable lead performance, and
Jean-Luc Godard's gorgeous in parts, though opaque and exasperating in more,
Film Socialisme, which
Tativille guest contributor
Lisa K. Broad recounted in far more skillful terms than this writer would be able.
Michelangelo Frammartino's Le quattro volte / The Four Times adds to the
La libertad (2001)-brand, work-oriented documentary-fiction hybrid in its construction of a primitive economy that accounts equally for the unique contributions of man, goat, tree and charcoal to the life and operation of a small Calabrian village. Frammartino succeeds in both reducing the cardinality of man to cinema - not only narratively but also in terms of his
mise-en-scène - and in finding a greater degree of structure than is common for
Lisandro Alonso imitations. Whether or not Frammartino's worldview is productive remains an open question, though his attempt at a Pythagorean sketching of spiritual transmigration, to paraphrase the Italian filmmaker, undoubtedly offers something new to the medium.
Crisi Puiu's Aurora even more radically remakes cinematic storytelling in its elimination of dialogue signposting, in favor of a greater conceptual authenticity, where the scenes from the life and crime of Puiu's lead mostly appear as they might have were the scenario non-faction. (No back-story is evident from the film's open, even as Puiu eschews cinema's characteristic redundancy.) Hence,
Aurora pushes the Romanian New Wave's default realist mode into truly original territory, where life is presented on screen as a largely unreadable sequence of events with immediately unclear character relations and motivations. It is in this sense the ultimate work of surveillance. Puiu's strategy is frustrating enough on occasion, however, to reinforce the virtues of what he negates - the elegance of the unobtrusive point of clarification reveals itself in its absence - though even this may add to Puiu's achievement inasmuch as it helps its viewer to better see the manner in which films traditionally disclose information.
Aurora is a major work to be sure, as much if not more - in many salient respects - than its exceedingly entertaining counter-point
The Social Network, with the Romanian director organically constructing a visual corollary for his minimalist narrative: Puiu greatly restricts his framing by placing the camera just outside doorways, thereby displacing much of his busy domestic beehive spaces -
Aurora confers a sense of how Romanians live - onto the off-camera field. More obscurity, in other words, which Puiu further introduces in a consistently unanswered telephone (which if anything suggests an active obfuscation of information that exceeds the aforesaid surveillance). Ultimately Puiu's work is about the absence of information that lends the film its substantial staying power: as its advanced reputation suggests,
Aurora really does haunt its viewer long after its three-hours, perhaps offering more interest in its post-viewing cognitive reconstruction than in the experience of viewing the film itself. For this alone,
Aurora is one of the year's greater accomplishments.
Caught for the past two or three decades in the existential act of making his final film, to paraphrase the Village Voice's
J. Hoberman, centenarian-plus one Manoel de Oliveira's
latest last testament,
The Strange Case of Angélica, fittingly provides a source narrative akin to
Apichatpong's Uncle Boonmee, with the River Douro and trick cinematography (cf. Ruiz again) offering personal, Lumière and Méliès-style poles. As befits a filmmaker of Oliveira's unprecedented late stage,
The Strange Case of Angélica is a work of uttermost freedom - like his recent
Belle Toujours (2006)
- with the director's interest typically alternating between cinema's original edge capabilities. Of course, Oliveira also commemorates and embalms, whether it is his career, the cinema, the ways of life of his Oporto home or a Europe whose decline the director has been sketching as long as he has been making his last.
